The expense of vaping ought to be reduced for smokers in developing countries as an urgent “human rights issue”, scientific study has told a pro-tobacco conference in London.
Addressing a 300-strong audience of tobacco and vaping industry representatives, Helen Redmond, an expert in substance use at Ny University’s Silver School of Social Work, said folks poor countries must not be priced from nicotine-based items that could help them to to quit smoking.
Redmond compared the medicinal qualities of nicotine with cannabis and stressed “the want to get vaping to the poorest, who want it most”.
“It’s a human rights issue – as being a harm reduction device, prices must fall,” she said. “Nicotine will not be a dirty drug, it helps with depression and anxiety.”
Academics at the 2018 global tobacco and nicotine forum called for further research into the possible medical benefits of nicotine along with a focus on the development of innovative nicotine-based items that will provide a “smoke-free society” and lower the harmful effects of cigarettes.
Viscount Matt Ridley, an author and member of the House of Lords, joined the chorus of experts promoting vaping as a kind of harm reduction, arguing that subjecting best electronic cig towards the same workplace restrictions as smoking could be considered an infringement of the individual’s human rights.
“We should treat vaping in a similar manner that we treat access to cell phones,” said Ridley. “The best practice to get people to give up [smoking] is to innovate with technology”.
Ridleytold the conference that, inspite of the industry’s continued focus on promoting nicotine-based products as a form of harm reduction, public opinion was moving far from vaping as a result of media “scare stories”. He compared the industry’s plight, particularly in america, for that faced by “bootleggers and baptists during prohibition”.
Clive Bates, director of advocacy group Counterfactual, described the views of anti-tobacco campaigners as “hostile and focused”, accusing them of getting rival commercial interests using a goal of “annihilating” the industry. Warning in the damage due to “those having a vested interest in causing alarm”, he explained that although critics laboured to produce evidence to “maintain the narrative of harm”, technological advances meant the transition to vape-type products was very likely to become mandatory rather than voluntary.
You can find 1.1 billion smokers worldwide and 6 million die every year as being a direct consequence of smoking. A further 890,000 people per year die prematurely due to second-hand smoke, in accordance with the World Health Organization.
Just one cigarette contains greater than 200 carcinogenic chemicals, as well as the addictive stimulant nicotine. Scientists and academics have so far failed to reach agreement on pros and cons of long term nicotine use.
With a plenary session, clinical psychologist Karl Fagerström called for research to the positive advantages of nicotine, that he believes can aid people suffering from Alzheimer’s and depression. Also, he advised wgferg the industry should move from combustible to nicotine-based products.
“No one is interested in establishing what the benefits of smoking nicotine are,” Fagerström said.
Martin Jarvis, professor of health psychology at University College London, saidthe US was moving towards prohibition-type enforcement, using the Food and Drug Administration keen to reduce the level of nicotine in cigarettes.
“Society doesn’t understand nicotine,” said Jarvis, “because they think it is particularly bad.”
But Jarvis said “describing nicotine as being addictive is justified”, adding that “80% of smokers wished they never started”.